current status of my exit procedure

Despite 27 years of physical and partly mental illness and eight years of physical illness, that doesn't allow me, my mental deficits on site, where they present themselves, namely in society, to improve, and
Despite the family doctor's writing and developing my illness vitae and the general advocacy of my death,, I am stopped by exit, to undergo further psychotherapy. Psychotherapy should at least 6 to 12 Take months and result in a specialist letter, that confirms my ability to judge and my psychiatric diagnosis “Borderline Personality Disorder” re -rolled up and justified.

The borderline personality is a sticking point, this is true, Nevertheless, I doubt about it, Whether I would reuss with the physical illness of ME/CFS. So I wonder, whether the new conditions of exit to me are not simply a more dodging (Like a time shine), Especially on the psychiatric youth early diagnosis BPS. My mental judgment was made in the family doctor's specialist report, which also serves as an expert opinion, confirmed, But the one in the year 2017 According to Exit,

which must be closed to today's date, not least, As you say, For the authorities, who, after a still not entirely legal death, has to logically open up the perfect course of the information developed. So says the company. Of course I wonder, How a course of illness is processed in the event of dementia or Parkinson's disease, Where the intellectual and mental judgment is no longer possible due to the physical illness. Whether the label of the disease is sufficient in such cases, to justify and implement the dying person.

The longer I over the “mental diagnosis” thinking, All the more I get to the goal, that she can't go through such a scenario at all without one … Aporia (haha, I wanted to use this word, Is it right here?) to stray in !? Any dying is mentally! And so how do the experts want about the purest subjectivity (something else is one “psychiatric disorder”?) impose an objectivity?! When it turns out, that my BPS my dying person because of the years of physical complaints and their psychological consequences, leg -flowing, whether negative still positive- What's the difference there?!- Then that has no meaning at all?!

Everyone with a physically incurable disease has a personality profile! So I don't even understand, How I can increase my chances of the goal that finally sought for me; When my BPS makes my death to be incredible, Because he from the “Massing and BPS-owned view of things, of the world, of the self stems (not compatible with nothing at all!)”, Then on the one hand it can also be seen as a negative impact on my life with the physical illness. So one could “reduced judgment”, because subjectively not full and Ganaz understandable, the physical suffering of the desire only make more plausible, I mean, Then again objective! While, In the opposite case: we say: My BPS would have grown up; one could also say; There are psychological resources, who put the overall situation in this way, that it would be true to me, The physical crippled existence even longer, Quasi to the end and therefore towards natural death, compensate …?!

So I came to the end, that there can be no objectivity at all, Except in the pathophysiological processes. Only the physical complaints are decisive, Compensated with the internists report proffessors, medical documents on the physical illness, the forecast, the, in my case, after such a long physical illness is hopeless.

So what should I tell this psychiatrist about the years of gaps? That I could no longer express my BPS, at most in kind, How I roll out my subjectivity in a text?! I mean, If there is a therapeutic accompaniment at all, What is a big difficulty, gives, namely, among other things, from my physical illness is also closed; that I am mentally exhausted! It is the logo!

Because that's how it is, that a human, who can no longer use his body, over years, As a rule, an economic burden is for these system, that his psychiatrist is borne, which their customers do not suffer according to the psychological suffering, but want to treat the economic user provision or do not want to treat.
This economic benefit, I've proven that for many years now, I do not provide, The opposite is the case. So why is this point of economy not finally included in the assessment of my dying person?!

It's a loss, which is much more important in the long run, As every psychiatrically developed resource! Economy goes through people!!!!!! Who has been sick for years and cannot work, usually loses everything …… not at once, very slowly. It doesn't even have to be, that you are mentally impoverished or suffer from psychological pathological unscrupulousness (Just like thousands over there and upstairs !), You can even have psychological resources; And yet: Nothing will change the situation, If no social and financial capital can be made with it! Even the love value of a person is determined within the said system, And not outside! So why not in the consequence of our system, of our value content to people take their lives or make their wishes easier, that cannot participate in this system and its bonuses, although you want this and maybe spent all your strength for it, to achieve this goal?! The departure from society or the retirement through this should be a point, which the death companies weight higher; speak: the social, From me from biopsychosocial circumstances. After all, it is sometimes the largest disease-preserving and maybe even resolving factor!

Exit, however, glossed over to his job outside, By probably unjustified by many people with long-long chronic disease, hope for a pain-free solution for a life of pain and alternative to suicide. I've been since 2016 with death companies (First dignitas) in exchange, and can say, that they are interested, to make the bureaucratic path as stony as possible.

Exits describes it that way:

“The right, To determine the type and time of your own death, fundamentally comes to all people in Switzerland.